"...that the object of oratory is to lead men by speaking to that which the speaker wishes."
Even though most of us are developing broader views on rhetoric than those of the Sophists (referred to in the quote above) and deny that rhetoric has to 'persuade' an audience, is it not truthful, or at least helpful in forming a definition of rhetoric, to think of oratory/rhetoric as a means of leadership?
I think forming a definition of rhetoric is important on an interpersonal level as a means of self understanding. However, I think having a definition in place within educational institutions is dangerous without the caveat that rhetoric is not something that can be given a "one way fits all" process, or purpose
ReplyDelete